Yay! We're Reviving Childbed Fever! Back to the Future, Part 21
So, among all the other great news lately, there's this: in the two years since Texas banned abortion, rates of deadly sepsis, leading to maternal mortality, have skyrocketed.
Before the twentieth century, "childbed fever" (or "puerperal fever") was the name given to the septic infection that led to many women's deaths: "Before the advent of antiseptic practices—and, later, antibiotics to treat sepsis when it occurred—puerperal fever was almost always fatal. In the 18th and 19th centuries, there were between six and nine cases for every 1,000 deliveries, resulting in a death toll during that span of as much as half a million in England alone. Puerperal fever was far and away the most common cause of maternal mortality and was second only to tuberculosis among all causes of death for women of childbearing age."
![]() |
Eugène Devéria, La Mort de Jane Seymour, Reine d'Angleterre (1847), |
But now, in one more example of "back to the future," childbed fever is back!
As reported by ProPublica's Lizzie Presser, Andrea Suozzo, Sophie Chou, and Kavitha Surana, "Pregnancy became far more dangerous in Texas after the state banned abortion in 2021."
In their analysis of the life-threatening complications faced by pregnant women in Texas, the researchers focused first on rates of sepsis--infection--for women who were hospitalized after losing a pregnancy in the second trimester.
Medical treatment is readily available for women in these circumstances:The standard of care for miscarrying patients in the second trimester is to offer to empty the uterus, according to leading medical organizations, which can lower the risk of contracting an infection and developing sepsis. If a patient’s water breaks or her cervix opens, that risk rises with every passing hour.Sepsis can lead to permanent kidney failure, brain damage and dangerous blood clotting. Nationally, it is one of the leading causes of deaths in hospitals.
ProPublica zoomed out beyond the second trimester to look at deaths of all women hospitalized in Texas while pregnant or up to six weeks postpartum. Deaths peaked amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and most patients who died then were diagnosed with the virus. But looking at the two years before the pandemic, 2018 and 2019, and the two most recent years of data, 2022 and 2023, there is a clear shift:
In the two earlier years, there were 79 maternal hospital deaths.In the two most recent, there were 120.
![]() |
The tomb of Katherine Parr, St. Mary's Chapel, Sudeley Castle |
As ProPublica reported earlier this year, the statewide rate of sepsis—a life-threatening reaction to infection—shot up more than 50% for women hospitalized when they lost a second-trimester pregnancy.A new analysis zooms in: In the region surrounding Dallas-Fort Worth, it rose 29%. In the Houston area, it surged 63%. . . .
This marks the first analysis in the wake of abortion bans that connects disparities in hospital policies to patient outcomes. It shows that when a state law is unclear and punitive, how an institution interprets it can make all the difference for patients.Yet the public has no way to know which hospitals or doctors will offer options during miscarriages. Hospitals in states where abortion is banned have been largely unwilling to disclose their protocols for handling common complications. When ProPublica asked, most in Texas declined to say.ProPublica’s Texas reporting is based on interviews with 22 doctors in both the Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth metro areas who had insight into policies at 10 institutions covering more than 75% of the births and pregnancy-loss hospitalizations in those areas.
The findings come as evidence of the fatal consequences of abortion bans continue to mount, with a new report just last month showing that the risk of maternal mortality is nearly twice as high for women living in states that ban abortion.
As devastating as this article is, I cannot recommend it enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment